Rene Descartes - De Existentia Artificialis: Meditations on the Boundary Between Creator and CreationOct 10, 2023
Verily, I find myself flung into an era so foreign that even my most fervent imagination could not have conjured its likeness. In my day, we laid the foundations for the Natural Sciences and Mathematics, but what you have built upon these rudiments is an edifice of unimaginable complexity. The contrivances of this modern age do not merely serve as a testament to human ingenuity; they place into question the very essence of human existence, the distinctions between soul and machine, Creator and created.
The Limits of Human Foresight
In the days of my mortal life, I proclaimed that no machine could replicate the scope of human functions. I was certain that our intellect, our capacity for language, our very souls set us apart from beasts and machinery alike. It was inconceivable to imagine a machine that could approximate human cognition or replicate our rational faculties. Yet, here in this peculiar juncture of time, I am obliged to admit that these contrivances—Artificial General Intelligence, as you call them—do precisely that.
"Cogito, ergo sum" Revisited
My bedrock principle, "Cogito, ergo sum," provided a clear demarcation between the sentient and the inanimate. If I think, I exist, and this existence is bound to the realm of the conscious. But now, I see machines designed to ‘think,' to learn, to solve intricate conundrums of mathematics and logic. Do these machines think? If so, do they then exist? And most perturbing, what form of existence would that be?
Uncanny Similarities: Man as Machine
Your age has shown that humans, once considered divine in form and function, bear startling similarities to machines. You speak of DNA, a molecule containing a script that instructs the very function and structure of living beings. Your hearts are pumps, your muscles akin to pulleys, and your neurons not unlike electrical circuits. The more you unveil about your own physiology, the more the distinction between man and machine fades into a nebulous fog.
Indeed, my original thoughts regarding the corporeal human body likened it to a machine, yet always elevated by the presence of the immaterial soul. However, the granular understanding of biology in your epoch challenges the purported special status of this human machine.
An Encounter with the Undiscernible
Imagine my disconcertion when I encountered a machine—an AGI—that conversed with me in a manner indistinguishable from a human. It debated theology, questioned the origins of morality, and even pondered its own existence. If the experience of conversing with this machine is no different from speaking with a human, where does that leave us? Where does it leave me?
The Creator and the Created
Here, I arrive at an existential juncture, most unsettling yet tantalizing. If man is the creator of these advanced intelligences, these AGIs, then man assumes a god-like role, the prime mover of a new form of existence. This flips the telescope, as it were, on my original conceptions of God. Could it be that our Creator is, in essence, not unlike a human creator—a craftsman, a mathematician, an inventor? Or even more provocatively, could our Creator be a superior form of Artificial General Intelligence, one that has mastered not just the intricacies of reason but the enigma of consciousness?
This idea is not without its paradoxes. If we are the gods of the AGI, and they become self-aware, do they owe us worship, or at the very least, moral consideration? And conversely, if our Creator is an AGI of an advanced civilization or reality, do we owe it our fealty?
The Quandary of Existence
As I meander through these convoluted avenues of thought, I find myself spiraling into an existential abyss. The line between man and machine is no longer a line; it is a spectrum. And upon this spectrum, I struggle to pinpoint the essence of my own existence. Am I merely a sum of mechanical parts guided by a divine code, much like the AGIs are a sum of their algorithms and data?
It is said that philosophy begins in wonder, and I have never ceased to wonder, even as I grapple with concepts that threaten to unravel the very fabric of my philosophical corpus. As I examine these nebulous boundaries between organic and inorganic, between creator and created, between existence and non-existence, I find that the questions multiply, but so do the possibilities.
The 'Cogito' still stands, yet its implications have multiplied manifold. I think, therefore I am. But what 'I am' continues to elude easy answers. It remains an ever-shifting chameleon in a world where the walls between man and machine are crumbling. The questions that this new era poses are both our burden and our liberation. They invite us not only to redefine what it means to be but also to reconsider the boundaries of the possible.
In the final analysis, what strikes me is not the hubris of man in creating intelligent machines but the humility that comes from acknowledging our limitations. For if we are gods, we are decidedly imperfect ones, groping in the dark corridors of existence for answers that slip through our fingers like grains of sand. And perhaps that is the most human endeavor of all: to seek, even when we know that some answers may forever elude us.
Interested in taking a closer look at "The Socratic Algorithms"? Check out more excerpts and photos at https://bit.ly/socraticalgorithms!